
The safest school girl picture in the first 1000 search results.
What do newspapers and online articles have in common? They’re both written at an eight grade level or lower. Experts say that some newspapers are even written at a fifth grade level! Not sure what it’s like in other countries but apparently that’s the case for the US.
Anyway, one way to measure the level of writing complexity is paragraph size (along with sentence structure and vocabulary). For this article, let’s dive a little deeper on that theory.
First, let’s take a look at The Wall Street Journal online. I grabbed the first article under the Markets page and here’s what I found:
Stocks Slide as Risk Loses Favor
Average paragraph: 33 words
Shortest paragraph: 12 words
Longest paragraph: 69 words
Now let’s examine the first article I found under CosmoGirl’s Daily Kiss Blog:
Sexy Halloween Costumes – Love it or Leave it?
Average paragraph: 76 words
Shortest paragraph: 26 words
Longest paragraph: 122 words
Who do you think the average WSJ reader is? And FYI, CosmoGirl’s target audience are teenage girls. The latter has larger paragraphs! Now I don’t want to break down sentence structures or vocabulary between the two but the key is — you have to make articles easy to read.
Sure, it’s not a big sampling but you get the idea. People have short attention spans. They want quick points and they want them broken up in small chunks.
I don’t know about you but other than my niece, I don’t know too many 14-year olds. Fortunately, I am great friends with a well-known sports writer in the NYC area and he has blessed my following sentiments for writing good articles.
- Shock value works – Use a title that captures the attention of a curious mind.
- What goes around, comes around – Open with a to-the-point paragraph or statement and conclude with the same point.
- Holy wall of text! – Keep short paragraphs of 25-100 words.
- Jargon rules – Use buzz words that are relevant to your audience (WSJ article used ‘risk aversion’ and ‘volatility’ while CG article used ‘flaunt’ and ‘xoxo’).
- No more books! – Make sure readers have no need for dictionaries or thesauruses.
- Kid-tested, kid approved – If you can’t pass it out to an elementary school to read, your article is written for a level too high for the masses.
Writing for a 14-year old doesn’t mean write like a 14-year old. We don’t have editors so we’re going to have typos and grammatically incorrect sentences. Keeping those to a minimum still holds true. We also still have to be good storytellers and be able to get our ideas across. We just have do it in a way that appeals to the general public.
Remember, a pubescent-minded blogger is a good blogger.










I am a business professional
with an entrepreneurial spirit. Although I have an MBA and managed websites and IT departments
for several Fortune 500 companies ...
“The safest school girl picture in the first 1000 search results.” Haha!
One of the things I can’t stand about the formatting on both of those websites is the images which are quite cumbersome on such narrow website layouts. If I want to read something online, it needs to be displayed in a fairly “open” fashion. The WSJ could do without that massive second column.
Justin´s last blog ..I have a blog, now what?
Great story!!! Too many people try to sound more intelligent than they have to be and they lose readers. The KISS method prevails!
Wait ’til you get a load of what I have in the queue for Tuesday, November 3: “Despite Best Efforts of Online Marketers… You Are Not An Idiot”
Dave Doolin | Website In A Weekend´s last blog ..DIY WordPress: Debugging Plugins Using FirePHP
Gabe, we’re going point and counterpoint on a series of articles. It’s very cool!
Dave Doolin | Website In A Weekend´s last blog ..Learning to Blog: Finding the forest one tree at a time
Looking forward to seeing the counter!
The WSJ site is optimized for resolution for a different demographic. Plus, there are usability studies that show that eyes only want to follow a certain distance across (usually 8 inches I believe). That said, you’re right, it’s still a little narrow.
As for the pic, even with safe search on, you’ll be hard pressed to find an innocent school girl picture!
I learn that we must know to whom we writing for. If it for 14 years old readers, just write for them with style they like.
Dana @ Online Knowledge´s last blog ..Use Comment Subscriber, Please!
I agree with your point on style. However, unlike many of the business docs I wrote in my career, I believe blogging has to be “dumbed down” just a bit.
I really dig this post. I can’t believe the WSJ had smaller numbers for all the metrics.
In this internet age we all have such a short attention span. I can hardly even write this comment without wanting to go check twitter or go drink a slurpee.
Writing stuff that keep people reading and moving quick is the way to go.
Blake @ Props Blog´s last blog ..Think Twice About Who You Put On Your Twitter Lists
Great post man, funny comparison!
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Blake Waddill, Blake Waddill. Blake Waddill said: RT @pnstlion Blog like you’re writing for a 14-year old girl http://retwt.me/1HiRa [...]
Some of my posts are longer than I would like but I still try to keep my paragraphs short, just for the Blakes of the world.
Thanks, Ben…and welcome!
BTW, is that a news story you’re using for your Gravatar?
the comparision is good between WSJ and blog.After so many days of blog reading I feel it more of leisure activity.I personally like post which are short.
Usually I don’t bother much about this. After reading your comparison it makes sense though. Well done
steppinout´s last blog ..Wordpress 2 for iPhone Now Available
excellent comparison..
Rajesh Kanuri´s last blog ..My Name “Rajesh Kanuri” Appeared in Google Search Suggestions
@Zeesu, @steppinout, and @Rajesh Kanuri, thanks for the comments. I believe there’s magic in simplifying posts.
It’s unfortunate but this post is absolutely the truth! Just goes to show the “Dumb-ing Down of America” is still in motion.
Ms. Freeman´s last blog ..What’s In Your Blogging Environment?
Sorry, I disagree. it depends on the subject.
There are always exceptions, especially in micro-niches where the targeted audience is either way more or way less advanced than the norm.
Generally speaking however, in order to appeal to the masses, sticking to the meat of the bell curve works well and doesn’t alienate anyone.